<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>AlwinHoogerdijk.com &#187; ad copy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alwinhoogerdijk.com/tag/ad-copy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alwinhoogerdijk.com</link>
	<description>Software Marketing, Adwords, SEO, Email Marketing, A/B Split testing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 16:04:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The word &#8220;download&#8221; in ads triggers manual approval?</title>
		<link>http://www.alwinhoogerdijk.com/2009/03/30/the-word-download-in-ads-triggers-manual-approval/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alwinhoogerdijk.com/2009/03/30/the-word-download-in-ads-triggers-manual-approval/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 12:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alwin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Adwords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad copy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alwinhoogerdijk.com/?p=87</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had noticed some weird &#8220;no impressions&#8221; effect a couple of weeks ago, but at the time I couldn&#8217;t pin it down to a specific word yet.
However, now I am pretty sure that using the word &#8220;download&#8221; in your Google ad can trigger their &#8220;manual approval&#8221; process. Here&#8217;s what happened:
This Saturday I added new ads [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had noticed some weird &#8220;no impressions&#8221; effect a couple of weeks ago, but at the time I couldn&#8217;t pin it down to a specific word yet.</p>
<p>However, now I am pretty sure that using the word &#8220;download&#8221; in your Google ad can trigger their &#8220;manual approval&#8221; process. Here&#8217;s what happened:</p>
<p>This Saturday I added new ads to a series of ad groups, for testing new ad copy. When I checked the ads a couple of hours later, I noticed that some of the new ones hadn&#8217;t received any impressions yet (these are high volume ad groups, so that was weird).<br />
<span id="more-87"></span></p>
<p>On Sunday, I checked again, still no impressions.</p>
<p>Now, on Monday morning they show some impressions, not many yet, so it looks like the ads just went live. That&#8217;s almost two days without impressions.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s happening here? It looks like the word &#8220;download&#8221; triggers Google&#8217;s manual ad approval now, or at least in some cases. Maybe it depends on a combination with other words?<br />
Investigating a bit further I noticed that my new Book Collector ads (including the line &#8220;Download Book Details &#038; Cover Art&#8221;) went live right away. But for both my Movie Collector and Music Collector campaigns all new ads had been on hold for two days. </p>
<p>Could it be that any combination of the word &#8220;download&#8221; with words like &#8220;movies&#8221; or &#8220;music&#8221; now gets flagged as possible illegal activities?</p>
<p>Has anyone seen the same effect? I am assuming that many software vendors use the word &#8220;download&#8221; in their ads, simply because it is an effective call-to-action.</p>
<p>Anyway, I am glad that I had added <b>new</b> ads, insteads of editing my <b>existing</b> ones. Otherwise my ad groups could have gone without any impressions for two whole days. Ouch&#8230;</p>
<p>So, here&#8217;s my tip for today: Never edit your existing ads, always add new ones. Then when the new one is doing better, delete the old one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alwinhoogerdijk.com/2009/03/30/the-word-download-in-ads-triggers-manual-approval/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
